Mining’s top ten ESG trends for 2026: risk and compliance lens for project teams
Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

First reported on MINING.com
30 Second Briefing
Mining companies in 2026 face ESG risk dominated by geopolitical fragmentation, with Russia’s war in Ukraine, Middle East conflict and African coups driving sanctions exposure, trade route disruption and board‑level scenario planning on supply chains and project delivery. Tailings governance is shifting from voluntary to quasi‑regulatory, as ICMM reports 67% GISTM conformance, the UK High Court’s Samarco ruling widens negligence exposure, and the World Mine Tailings Failures database projects 13 catastrophic failures by 2029. Simultaneously, ISSB IFRS S2 climate disclosure, GRI 14: Mining Sector 2024 and TNFD uptake by 730+ organisations, including 179 financial institutions with $22 trillion in assets, are turning climate, water, land disturbance and biodiversity into hard conditions for capital and permitting.
Technical Brief
- AI deployments now cover real‑time monitoring of water, tailings and air emissions at operating sites.
- Predictive maintenance and safety analytics use AI to anticipate equipment failures and high‑risk behaviours.
- Satellite-based land‑use monitoring is being integrated with ESG systems to track disturbance and rehabilitation.
- Automated Scope 3 accounting tools are emerging, tightening audit trails for downstream emissions reporting.
- For mine operators, AI governance now requires explicit controls, shutdown protocols and cyber‑secure architectures alongside traditional safety systems.
Our Take
With jurisdictions covering more than half of global GDP moving toward ISSB’s IFRS S2 and GRI 14: Mining becoming effective in 2026, miners with large critical minerals exposure in Canada, Australia and the US are likely to face converging but more granular climate and sector-specific disclosure, raising the bar for board-level ESG competence rather than just reporting capacity.
The forecast of 13 catastrophic tailings failures by 2029, despite 67% GISTM conformance at ICMM member facilities, signals that non-member or smaller operators—especially in Africa and parts of Latin America not highlighted here—may become a focal point for lenders and insurers applying TNFD- and UNEP FI-aligned risk screens to tailings design and closure plans.
Barclays’ finding that nature risks could cut mining earnings by up to 25% over five years, combined with TNFD adoption by 179 financial institutions managing US$22 trillion, suggests that access to capital for critical minerals projects will increasingly hinge on quantified nature-risk scenarios (water, biodiversity, physical climate impacts) rather than high-level ESG narratives alone.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


