Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Standard/Guideline
    Sustainability
    Safety

    CECA response to CMA market study: procurement and design lessons for engineers

    January 30, 2026|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    CECA response to CMA market study: procurement and design lessons for engineers

    First reported on The Construction Index

    30 Second Briefing

    Civil engineering contractors, through the Civil Engineering Contractors Association, have urged the Competition & Markets Authority’s road and rail market study to push harder for early contractor involvement, outcome-based specifications and frameworks tied to clear, funded pipelines with minimum workload commitments. CECA wants procurement to move away from lowest-price weighting towards whole-life value, with objectively scored criteria for quality, deliverability, safety culture, carbon reduction and social value. The response also calls for streamlined regulatory approvals for new products and techniques, consistent national standards, and stronger commercial and engineering skills within client bodies.

    Technical Brief

    • Contractors signal current procurement reforms (ECI, frameworks) are directionally acceptable but insufficient in scale and pace.
    • Bid intensity and “market churn” are flagged as systemic risks where pipeline visibility and workload guarantees are weak.
    • Secondary competition within frameworks is criticised for adding red tape and cost without proportional delivery benefit.
    • CECA calls for standardised performance data sharing across regions and devolved nations to benchmark delivery and safety.
    • Better use of “delivery partners” is proposed to plug gaps in client-side commercial and engineering competence.

    Our Take

    Among the 109 Policy stories in our coverage, UK-focused pieces involving the Competition & Markets Authority are relatively rare, so this CMA market study response from CECA is likely to be a reference point for later UK procurement and competition debates in civil engineering.

    Within the 625 tag-matched items on Standards/Guidelines, Sustainability and Safety, most UK stories centre on regulator-led updates rather than contractor associations, suggesting CECA’s engagement here may give contractors more direct influence over how future CMA guidance is interpreted on site and in supply chains.

    For United Kingdom contractors, CMA scrutiny typically feeds into public-sector procurement rules and framework contracts, so any outcomes from this market study could indirectly reshape risk allocation, margins and safety responsibilities on major civil works over the medium term.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners
    Policy
    about 6 hours ago

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners

    Project Vault will create a US$12 billion US critical minerals stockpile, combining US$1.67 billion in private capital with a US$10 billion Export-Import Bank loan to buy and store materials for automakers, tech firms and other industrial users. Following a Section 232 probe covering the full USGS critical minerals list plus uranium, the administration found imports threaten national security but chose negotiated price floors and trade mechanisms over tariffs. Forthcoming US–Mexico and US–EU–Japan action plans, under the new FORGE framework, will define which minerals are prioritised, how any border-adjusted price floor is calculated, and how rules of origin or downstream products are treated.

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 7 hours ago

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams

    British Columbia investor Varandeep Singh Grewal has agreed to pay C$500,000 and accept a 10‑year ban from acting as a registrant, promoter or securities market consultant after the BC Securities Commission found he facilitated misleading investor relations for a supposed mineral exploration startup. Over two months in 2018, a third‑party IR provider, arranged by Grewal, claimed the company was actively mining, producing minerals and using “state‑of‑the‑art, environmental‑friendly” technology, when it in fact remained purely in the exploration phase with no such infrastructure. The case signals tighter scrutiny of promotional claims around early‑stage mining projects, particularly where production and proprietary technology are asserted without evidence.

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 17 hours ago

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams

    Delays at the Building Safety Regulator’s Gateway 3 stage are linked by law firm Irwin Mitchell to 44 undecided schemes and 5,594 completed higher-risk residential units remaining unoccupied, with one case waiting 550 days against an eight‑week target. Of 158 Gateway 3 applications in 2023, 55 took more than three months for a decision, raising concerns over cashflow impacts on developers and handover timing for residents. The BSR disputes the interpretation, stating no new-build higher-risk building that passed Gateway 2 has yet applied for Gateway 3 and that current cases are mainly transitional legacy projects with significant safety issues.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.

    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy