CECA response to CMA market study: procurement and design lessons for engineers
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

First reported on The Construction Index
30 Second Briefing
Civil engineering contractors, through the Civil Engineering Contractors Association, have urged the Competition & Markets Authority’s road and rail market study to push harder for early contractor involvement, outcome-based specifications and frameworks tied to clear, funded pipelines with minimum workload commitments. CECA wants procurement to move away from lowest-price weighting towards whole-life value, with objectively scored criteria for quality, deliverability, safety culture, carbon reduction and social value. The response also calls for streamlined regulatory approvals for new products and techniques, consistent national standards, and stronger commercial and engineering skills within client bodies.
Technical Brief
- Contractors signal current procurement reforms (ECI, frameworks) are directionally acceptable but insufficient in scale and pace.
- Bid intensity and “market churn” are flagged as systemic risks where pipeline visibility and workload guarantees are weak.
- Secondary competition within frameworks is criticised for adding red tape and cost without proportional delivery benefit.
- CECA calls for standardised performance data sharing across regions and devolved nations to benchmark delivery and safety.
- Better use of “delivery partners” is proposed to plug gaps in client-side commercial and engineering competence.
Our Take
Among the 109 Policy stories in our coverage, UK-focused pieces involving the Competition & Markets Authority are relatively rare, so this CMA market study response from CECA is likely to be a reference point for later UK procurement and competition debates in civil engineering.
Within the 625 tag-matched items on Standards/Guidelines, Sustainability and Safety, most UK stories centre on regulator-led updates rather than contractor associations, suggesting CECA’s engagement here may give contractors more direct influence over how future CMA guidance is interpreted on site and in supply chains.
For United Kingdom contractors, CMA scrutiny typically feeds into public-sector procurement rules and framework contracts, so any outcomes from this market study could indirectly reshape risk allocation, margins and safety responsibilities on major civil works over the medium term.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


