Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners

    February 16, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners

    First reported on MINING.com

    30 Second Briefing

    Project Vault will create a US$12 billion US critical minerals stockpile, combining US$1.67 billion in private capital with a US$10 billion Export-Import Bank loan to buy and store materials for automakers, tech firms and other industrial users. Following a Section 232 probe covering the full USGS critical minerals list plus uranium, the administration found imports threaten national security but chose negotiated price floors and trade mechanisms over tariffs. Forthcoming US–Mexico and US–EU–Japan action plans, under the new FORGE framework, will define which minerals are prioritised, how any border-adjusted price floor is calculated, and how rules of origin or downstream products are treated.

    Technical Brief

    • Section 232 investigation scope covered the full USGS critical minerals list plus uranium, not just battery metals.
    • Commerce explicitly linked mineral price volatility to underinvestment in US and allied mining and processing capacity.
    • National security finding was made under Section 232, yet the remedy chosen was negotiated trade tools, not tariffs.
    • USTR and Commerce have been tasked to design trade-restrictive mechanisms centred on administratively set price floors.
    • Legal uncertainty currently centres on how any border-adjusted price floor will be benchmarked against China-based reference prices.

    Our Take

    Project Vault’s $10 billion US Export-Import Bank facility sits at the upper end of state-backed critical minerals support in our Policy coverage, signalling that Washington is prepared to deploy export-credit scale tools rather than rely solely on tax incentives or DFC-style project finance.

    Linking Project Vault to BHP’s $18 billion Vicuna copper build in Argentina underlines that US security-of-supply strategies will increasingly hinge on third-country assets, which may complicate permitting and community-risk allocation for operators looking to qualify under US-origin or ‘trusted partner’ rules.

    The related Section 232 piece on processed critical minerals (28 January 2026) shows the US leaning towards supply agreements over tariffs for copper and silver, suggesting that projects tied into Vault-style stockpiles could gain preferential offtake visibility rather than pure price protection.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 8 hours ago

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams

    British Columbia investor Varandeep Singh Grewal has agreed to pay C$500,000 and accept a 10‑year ban from acting as a registrant, promoter or securities market consultant after the BC Securities Commission found he facilitated misleading investor relations for a supposed mineral exploration startup. Over two months in 2018, a third‑party IR provider, arranged by Grewal, claimed the company was actively mining, producing minerals and using “state‑of‑the‑art, environmental‑friendly” technology, when it in fact remained purely in the exploration phase with no such infrastructure. The case signals tighter scrutiny of promotional claims around early‑stage mining projects, particularly where production and proprietary technology are asserted without evidence.

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 18 hours ago

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams

    Delays at the Building Safety Regulator’s Gateway 3 stage are linked by law firm Irwin Mitchell to 44 undecided schemes and 5,594 completed higher-risk residential units remaining unoccupied, with one case waiting 550 days against an eight‑week target. Of 158 Gateway 3 applications in 2023, 55 took more than three months for a decision, raising concerns over cashflow impacts on developers and handover timing for residents. The BSR disputes the interpretation, stating no new-build higher-risk building that passed Gateway 2 has yet applied for Gateway 3 and that current cases are mainly transitional legacy projects with significant safety issues.

    Passengers’ Council powers debate: implications for UK rail designers and asset teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    Passengers’ Council powers debate: implications for UK rail designers and asset teams

    MPs on Parliament’s transport select committee are questioning whether the Railways Bill’s proposed Passengers’ Council will have any real enforcement powers to deliver a fully accessible national rail network. Concerns centre on the council’s ability to compel infrastructure managers and train operators to retrofit step-free access, tactile paving and compliant boarding interfaces across thousands of stations and platforms. For designers and asset owners, the outcome will influence how strongly accessibility standards are mandated in future station upgrades, platform works and rolling stock procurement.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.