Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy
    Failure
    Safety
    Projects

    Assessing dam failure risk with WTW: probabilistic insights for dam engineers

    February 26, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Assessing dam failure risk with WTW: probabilistic insights for dam engineers

    First reported on New Civil Engineer

    30 Second Briefing

    Assessing dam failure risk with WTW takes centre stage in the latest Engineers Collective podcast, focusing on how insurers and engineers jointly quantify breach probabilities and downstream consequences for large embankment and concrete gravity dams. Discussion covers use of probabilistic risk assessment, portfolio-level screening tools and event trees to evaluate failure modes such as overtopping, internal erosion and spillway degradation under extreme rainfall. The episode also examines how updated risk metrics influence capital maintenance planning, emergency drawdown provisions and prioritisation of dam safety upgrades.

    Technical Brief

    • Failure investigation emphasis is on internal erosion mechanisms, including concentrated leaks and backward erosion piping.
    • WTW discuss combining historical incident databases with dam-specific condition assessments to refine mode likelihoods.
    • Portfolio screening tools are described as triage, flagging structures needing detailed finite element or CFD analysis.
    • Forensic back-analysis of past overtopping and spillway incidents is used to calibrate breach development assumptions.
    • Monitoring focus includes piezometers, leakage flow meters and deformation surveys to detect early internal erosion signatures.
    • Remediation options covered range from filter/drain retrofits and crest-raising to auxiliary spillways and fuse plugs.
    • Insurance-led reviews reportedly push owners to formalise dam safety management systems and periodic independent risk audits.
    • Discussion suggests regulators may increasingly expect probabilistic risk outputs to inform emergency planning and public communication.

    Our Take

    Within the 37 Hazards stories in our coverage, very few focus on third‑party risk advisers like WTW, signalling that insurers and brokers are only just starting to feature as active players in dam failure risk governance rather than sitting purely in the background on policy wording.

    The combination of Failure, Safety and Projects tags aligns this piece with a subset of hazards coverage that typically deals with design-stage risk quantification, suggesting WTW’s methods may be most relevant for owners and EPCs trying to evidence ALARP and defensible risk registers to lenders and regulators.

    Given that many of the 1,640 keyword‑matched pieces involve AI or artificial intelligence, WTW’s dam failure risk work is likely to be read alongside emerging AI‑enabled risk tools, which could push operators to reconcile traditional actuarial approaches with data‑driven, near‑real‑time monitoring of dam performance.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Melbourne sinkhole investigations: geotechnical lessons for tunnel project teams
    Hazards
    in 4 months

    Melbourne sinkhole investigations: geotechnical lessons for tunnel project teams

    A sinkhole roughly 8–10 m wide and several metres deep has opened on the AJ Burkitt Reserve sporting oval in Heidelberg, directly adjacent to the North East Link tunnel alignment in Melbourne’s northeast. Victorian Infrastructure Delivery Authority has confirmed the “surface hole” is in the vicinity of active tunnelling operations, leading to a work pause while engineers and emergency crews carry out geotechnical investigations and monitoring. No injuries or structural damage have been reported, but the area remains fully cordoned off pending cause determination and stability assessment.

    Reddem asbestos waste site fine: compliance lessons for demolition engineers
    Hazards
    3 days ago

    Reddem asbestos waste site fine: compliance lessons for demolition engineers

    Demolition contractor Reddem Ltd has been fined £4,000, with £4,000 costs and a £1,600 victim surcharge, for operating an illegal asbestos waste site at The Old Gas Works Yard in Wooler, Northumberland, without an environmental permit. Environment Agency and HSE inspections in June 2023 found nine skips with asbestos-containing demolition waste stored in open containers, contrary to requirements for double-bagging and sealed, enclosed skips. More than 40 tonnes of asbestos material were subsequently removed to a permitted facility, signalling continued strict enforcement of asbestos handling and waste permitting rules on demolition projects.

    ROPS removal proves fatal: slope stability and risk lessons for ground engineers
    Hazards
    7 days ago

    ROPS removal proves fatal: slope stability and risk lessons for ground engineers

    A 23-year-old grounds worker, Kamil Grygieniec, was killed when a ride-on mower without its roll-over protection system (ROPS) descended a steep slope and overturned into a village pond at North Stainley, near Ripon, on 8 October 2021. HSE investigators found the factory-fitted ROPS had been removed and that no suitable, site-specific risk assessment for mowing on sloping, uneven ground had been carried out. Employer MHS Countryside Management Limited, of Bishop Auckland, was fined £27,000 plus £11,166 costs at York Magistrates’ Court for breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.