Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Simplified.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy
    Projects
    Safety

    2025 geomagnetic storm: operational risk notes for geotechnical project teams

    November 11, 2025|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    2025 geomagnetic storm: operational risk notes for geotechnical project teams

    First reported on Geoengineer.org – News

    30 Second Briefing

    A severe geomagnetic storm forecast for mid-November 2025, rated G4–G5 and driven by multiple coronal mass ejections, is prompting grid operators to pre-emptively isolate selected high-voltage transmission circuits to protect large transformers while keeping consumer supply stable. Induced geomagnetically driven currents in long conductors threaten high‑latitude power networks, with likely temporary shutdowns or derating as protection relays trip on rapid voltage and frequency fluctuations. Satellite-based GPS, high‑frequency radio and mobile networks may suffer timing errors and intermittent loss, stressing geotechnical operations that depend on precise positioning, remote monitoring and emergency communications.

    Technical Brief

    • Multiple coronal mass ejections are expected to merge en route, increasing disturbance duration and peak geomagnetic field gradients.
    • High-latitude transmission networks are singled out as most exposed due to longer line lengths and proximity to auroral electrojets.
    • National operators are already rerouting power flows around vulnerable corridors as a formal pre‑event mitigation measure.
    • Protection schemes are expected to see frequent nuisance trips as voltage and frequency deviate outside relay tolerance bands.
    • Satellite timing errors will directly affect GPS‑based machine control, GNSS survey, and PPP/RTK correction services used on sites.
    • Aviation, maritime and emergency services are flagged as priority users for HF and satellite communication contingency planning.

    Our Take

    Because this G4–G5 geomagnetic storm sits in a Hazards category that has only a handful of stories, it effectively pushes space-weather into the same risk-planning bucket as more familiar geohazards for projects tagged under Safety, especially in regions like the U.S. east coast and South Australia with long linear power and comms infrastructure.

    For software-heavy workflows such as GeoStudio 2025.1 and PLAXIS 2025.1, a key implication is the need to validate how geomagnetically induced currents and satellite outages are represented in load and monitoring assumptions, particularly for deep foundations and tunnelling projects like those referenced for Parcel 12 and the Nizhny Novgorod Metro.

    The presence of satellite and AI-based monitoring projects (e.g. ‘Satellite Technology and AI: The Future of Dam Monitoring and Disaster Prevention’) in the same project set suggests operators in countries like Iran, Myanmar and New Zealand will need contingency plans for data gaps or false alarms when geomagnetic storms disrupt GNSS and InSAR baselines.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Highway 18 rainfall rockfall: geotechnical lessons and mitigation options
    Hazards
    6 days ago

    Highway 18 rainfall rockfall: geotechnical lessons and mitigation options

    Rainfall-triggered rockfall on Highway 18 in San Bernardino County has blocked lanes and damaged barriers along a steep cut slope, following weeks of intense winter storms that saturated highly fractured granitic and metamorphic rock. Caltrans geotechnical crews report multiple failures from tension cracks and oversteepened slopes above the roadway, with debris reaching the carriageway and impacting existing rockfall fences. Engineers are now assessing options including expanded rock bolting, additional draped mesh, improved surface and subsurface drainage, and revised slope scaling protocols ahead of further atmospheric river events.

    Shap lineside monitoring warning: slope stability lessons for rail engineers
    Hazards
    11 days ago

    Shap lineside monitoring warning: slope stability lessons for rail engineers

    Lineside monitoring systems on parts of Britain’s rail network may fail to detect embankment or cutting slope movements during extreme rainfall, the Rail Accident Investigation Branch has warned following the 3 November passenger train derailment near Shap, Cumbria. The warning concerns remote condition monitoring equipment installed to trigger alerts for ground instability, which did not prevent the derailment. Geotechnical and asset engineers are being urged to review sensor siting, trigger thresholds and system performance in severe weather, particularly on high-risk slopes.

    RAIB landslip monitor alert: rapid failure lessons for rail geotechnical teams
    Hazards
    11 days ago

    RAIB landslip monitor alert: rapid failure lessons for rail geotechnical teams

    Railway managers have been warned by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch that Network Rail’s lineside slope monitoring systems may fail to give usable alerts during rapid failures, after an Avanti West Coast train derailed at around 83 mph near Shap Summit on 3 November 2025 when it struck landslip debris. Remote sensors on steel spikes at 2 m spacing recorded sub‑10 mm movements—below the 10–30 mm “green” alert threshold—before being rapidly buried, losing wireless signal and generating no alarm to control. The landslip followed heavy, sustained rainfall that overwhelmed a cutting‑slope drainage channel, and RAIB has urged duty holders to urgently review and, where needed, mitigate these monitoring limitations.

    Related Industries & Products

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    Tunnelling

    Specialised solutions for tunnelling projects including grout mix design, hydrogeological analysis, and quality control.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.