Worker’s scaffold fall fines: lifting and planning lessons for project teams
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell
First reported on The Construction Index
30 Second Briefing
A labourer working for Premier Property & Construction Limited suffered life-changing injuries after being pulled over the edge of scaffolding during an unplanned lifting operation at a Cathcart Hill refurbishment site in London on 15 April 2024, when an untested lifting accessory snagged and then released. Health & Safety Executive investigators found routine lifting was neither planned nor monitored, and untested, unsuitable lifting gear was allowed on the scaffold. Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court fined principal contractor Axis Europe Limited £640,000 and Premier Property & Construction £160,000, plus identical costs and victim surcharges.
Technical Brief
- Failure mechanism involved an unplanned lift where a snagged load suddenly released, imparting destabilising horizontal force.
- HSE investigation focused on planning, management and monitoring of routine lifting operations and accessory selection.
- Axis Europe admitted breaching CDM 2015 Regulation 13(1) on principal contractor duties for managing construction work.
- Premier Property & Construction admitted breaching CDM 2015 Regulation 15(2) covering contractor duties to plan and manage work.
- Financial penalties: Axis Europe fined £640,000; Premier Property & Construction fined £160,000, plus identical costs and surcharges.
- Identical prosecution costs of £4,787.59 and £2,000 victim surcharge were ordered against each company.
- HSE comment links this incident to a substantial proportion of serious construction accidents arising from inadequate planning and oversight.
Our Take
Among the 469 safety- and failure-tagged pieces in our coverage, UK incidents involving the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) often lead to follow-on enforcement across a contractor’s wider portfolio, so firms like Premier Property & Construction and Axis Europe may face closer scrutiny on other London and South East sites.
The London and Essex locations cited here sit within one of the densest clusters of Infrastructure coverage in our database, suggesting that regional contractors are operating in a comparatively high-enforcement environment where even mid-scale scaffold failures are more likely to result in public prosecutions.
Given the 2024 incident and a 2025 hearing, the roughly 18–20 month lag aligns with other UK construction safety cases in our database, which signals to project managers that documentation and competence records need to be preserved well beyond immediate post-incident investigations.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
QCDB-io
Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.