Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy
    Standard/Guideline
    Projects

    Passengers’ Council powers debate: implications for UK rail designers and asset teams

    February 13, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Passengers’ Council powers debate: implications for UK rail designers and asset teams

    First reported on New Civil Engineer

    30 Second Briefing

    MPs on Parliament’s transport select committee are questioning whether the Railways Bill’s proposed Passengers’ Council will have any real enforcement powers to deliver a fully accessible national rail network. Concerns centre on the council’s ability to compel infrastructure managers and train operators to retrofit step-free access, tactile paving and compliant boarding interfaces across thousands of stations and platforms. For designers and asset owners, the outcome will influence how strongly accessibility standards are mandated in future station upgrades, platform works and rolling stock procurement.

    Technical Brief

    • Railways Bill proposes a statutory Passengers’ Council as part of wider rail reform package.
    • Committee questioning focused on whether the council’s remit would extend beyond advisory functions into binding directions.
    • Witnesses were asked how enforcement could be structured without cutting across operators’ safety obligations.

    Our Take

    Within our 141 Policy stories, UK rail accessibility and standards pieces often flag that non-departmental bodies like the proposed Passengers’ Council only gain real leverage when their remit is explicitly tied to funding or project approvals, which is not guaranteed here.

    Across the 1960 tag-matched ‘Standard/Guideline’ and ‘Projects’ items, UK infrastructure governance frequently fragments between regulators, operators and advisory councils, suggesting that without statutory teeth the Passengers’ Council may struggle to influence design decisions on major rail upgrades.

    For the United Kingdom, our recent policy coverage shows accessibility requirements increasingly being embedded at the project design stage rather than retrofitted, so any weakness in the Passengers’ Council’s mandate could leave engineers relying more on existing technical standards than on user-led guidance.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 15 hours ago

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams

    Delays at the Building Safety Regulator’s Gateway 3 stage are linked by law firm Irwin Mitchell to 44 undecided schemes and 5,594 completed higher-risk residential units remaining unoccupied, with one case waiting 550 days against an eight‑week target. Of 158 Gateway 3 applications in 2023, 55 took more than three months for a decision, raising concerns over cashflow impacts on developers and handover timing for residents. The BSR disputes the interpretation, stating no new-build higher-risk building that passed Gateway 2 has yet applied for Gateway 3 and that current cases are mainly transitional legacy projects with significant safety issues.

    NI 43-101 and online disclosure: policy takeaways for project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    NI 43-101 and online disclosure: policy takeaways for project teams

    NI 43-101’s standardised technical reports and qualified person requirements stabilised disclosure after Bre-X, but Erik Groves, corporate strategy and in-house counsel at Morgan Companies, argues they now mask chronic diluters whose projects never advance despite repeated financings and high G&A. With Canadian National Policy 51-201 still warning against “sporadic” online rumour correction on chat rooms and bulletin boards, legal advice often keeps issuers off X, YouTube and Reddit while retail investors crowdsource geology and drill-interval analysis. Groves calls for a defined safe harbour allowing video documentation of fieldwork, plain-language geological reasoning and public misinformation correction, without pre-releasing material results or implying unsupported resources.

    NSW Demerit Point Reward Program: behavioural safety lever for road engineers
    Policy
    4 days ago

    NSW Demerit Point Reward Program: behavioural safety lever for road engineers

    New South Wales has introduced a bill to make its Demerit Point Reward Program permanent, following a trial that began in 2023 to encourage safer driving behaviour. The scheme rewards motorists who avoid new offences over a defined period by restoring demerit points, directly affecting licence suspension thresholds and enforcement loads on the road network. For road and traffic engineers, the programme’s permanence would lock in a behavioural lever that can be modelled alongside physical safety upgrades, speed zoning and enforcement camera placement.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.