ICE Building Safeguards action plan: safety case implications for engineers
Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

First reported on New Civil Engineer
30 Second Briefing
Delivery of the Institution of Civil Engineers’ Building Safeguards action plan is now in focus, following its 2024 review of safety and risk management that builds on the 2018 In Plain Sight report issued after the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire. The programme targets clearer dutyholder accountability, more rigorous competence requirements and stronger assurance processes across design, construction and asset management. For practising engineers, this signals tighter expectations around safety cases, risk registers and independent technical review on complex buildings and higher-risk structures.
Technical Brief
- Building Safeguards sets out a time-bound action plan owned by the ICE Trustee Board.
- Governance changes include a dedicated safety oversight role within ICE’s internal committee structure.
- Professional review processes are being updated so safety leadership is explicitly assessed for all membership grades.
- ICE is aligning its guidance with the new Building Safety Regulator regime and associated secondary legislation.
- Updated practice notes will reference the golden thread concept for information management across a building’s life.
- The action plan calls for closer integration of CDM duties with professional codes of conduct.
- ICE intends to embed learning from past failures into mandatory CPD themes over multiple years.
- For complex infrastructure and construction projects, the programme anticipates more formalised, auditable safety decision records.
Our Take
Within the 147 Policy stories in our database, very few explicitly trace a standards or safeguards initiative back to a single triggering disaster as clearly as ICE’s Building Safeguards does to the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire, which signals that this piece is part of a relatively focused strand of post-Grenfell governance reform rather than generic safety commentary.
The safety and standards focus here sits alongside coverage of enforcement-led cases such as the Hinkley Point C prosecutions (Bristol Crown Court, 2022 incident), highlighting how UK regulators and professional bodies are now operating on twin tracks: proactive guidance (ICE/Building Safeguards) and high-profile legal action when dutyholders fall short.
Because In Plain Sight dates from 2018, this trustee’s view effectively benchmarks how far institutional responses have moved from early post-Grenfell diagnostic work to a more operational ‘action plan’ phase, which practitioners can read as a signal that ICE expects demonstrable changes in project governance rather than further reviews.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
QCDB-io
Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.


