Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Op-Ed

    Germany’s US gold reserves: strategic risk and custody lessons for project teams

    January 27, 2026|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    Germany’s US gold reserves: strategic risk and custody lessons for project teams

    First reported on MINING.com

    30 Second Briefing

    Germany is facing renewed political pressure to repatriate about 1,200 tonnes of gold currently stored at the New York Federal Reserve, worth roughly $128 billion at this week’s record price above $5,100/oz. Former Bundesbank research head Emanuel Mönch and European Taxpayers Association chief Michael Jäger argue that Trump’s renewed presidency, aggressive trade stance and even pressure to seize Greenland make US vault storage strategically unsafe. Ifo Institute president Clemens Fuest counters that large-scale transfers from New York, London and Paris could strain transatlantic relations and trigger wider financial repercussions.

    Technical Brief

    • About one-third of Germany’s total bullion stock is physically stored in the New York Fed’s Manhattan vaults.
    • That New York allocation is estimated at roughly 1,200 tonnes of gold bars.
    • The storage pattern originates from Cold War contingency planning against potential Soviet advances into West Germany.
    • Emanuel Mönch, ex-Bundesbank research head, urges reassessment of foreign storage to increase strategic autonomy.
    • Michael Jäger of the European Taxpayers Association advocates rapid physical transfer of US‑held bars back to Germany.
    • Jäger renewed his call after US political moves regarding possible seizure of Greenland, citing asset security concerns.
    • Italy, as the third‑largest sovereign gold holder, faces similar political pressure over New York‑stored bullion.

    Our Take

    With Germany holding the world’s second-largest gold reserves, any move by Bundesbank to repatriate metal from the New York Federal Reserve would be closely watched by other European reserve holders in our database, especially those with sizeable allocations in US vaults but limited domestic storage infrastructure.

    The $245 billion in gold that Germany and Italy are being pushed to repatriate is large enough that even a phased physical transfer could tighten available liquidity in key trading hubs like London and New York, affecting how bullion banks structure swaps and leases referenced in several of our other gold-policy pieces.

    An 80% year-on-year gold price increase, combined with Germany’s $128 billion position in New York, raises operational questions for central banks about insurance, transport security, and bar-assay verification—areas where our coverage shows more institutions quietly commissioning audits and contingency logistics rather than making headline policy changes.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners
    Policy
    about 6 hours ago

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners

    Project Vault will create a US$12 billion US critical minerals stockpile, combining US$1.67 billion in private capital with a US$10 billion Export-Import Bank loan to buy and store materials for automakers, tech firms and other industrial users. Following a Section 232 probe covering the full USGS critical minerals list plus uranium, the administration found imports threaten national security but chose negotiated price floors and trade mechanisms over tariffs. Forthcoming US–Mexico and US–EU–Japan action plans, under the new FORGE framework, will define which minerals are prioritised, how any border-adjusted price floor is calculated, and how rules of origin or downstream products are treated.

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 7 hours ago

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams

    British Columbia investor Varandeep Singh Grewal has agreed to pay C$500,000 and accept a 10‑year ban from acting as a registrant, promoter or securities market consultant after the BC Securities Commission found he facilitated misleading investor relations for a supposed mineral exploration startup. Over two months in 2018, a third‑party IR provider, arranged by Grewal, claimed the company was actively mining, producing minerals and using “state‑of‑the‑art, environmental‑friendly” technology, when it in fact remained purely in the exploration phase with no such infrastructure. The case signals tighter scrutiny of promotional claims around early‑stage mining projects, particularly where production and proprietary technology are asserted without evidence.

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 17 hours ago

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams

    Delays at the Building Safety Regulator’s Gateway 3 stage are linked by law firm Irwin Mitchell to 44 undecided schemes and 5,594 completed higher-risk residential units remaining unoccupied, with one case waiting 550 days against an eight‑week target. Of 158 Gateway 3 applications in 2023, 55 took more than three months for a decision, raising concerns over cashflow impacts on developers and handover timing for residents. The BSR disputes the interpretation, stating no new-build higher-risk building that passed Gateway 2 has yet applied for Gateway 3 and that current cases are mainly transitional legacy projects with significant safety issues.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.

    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy