B.C. appeal on Indigenous mining consultation: key permitting impacts for projects
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

First reported on MINING.com
30 Second Briefing
British Columbia has appealed a December 2025 ruling that found its Mineral Tenure Act breaches consultation duties by allowing mineral claims staking on Gitxaała and Ehattesaht territories without prior First Nations engagement. The 3 February filing to the Supreme Court of Canada argues the appeals court misapplied B.C.’s 2019 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) and risks giving UNDRIP “quasi-constitutional status”, creating a “parallel universe of litigation”. Premier David Eby plans DRIPA amendments this spring after talks with First Nations, while leaders including Gitxaała Chief Councillor Linda Innes warn rushed reforms could weaken enforceable rights over exploration permitting.
Technical Brief
- DRIPA, enacted in 2019, legally anchors alignment of B.C. statutes with UNDRIP principles.
- Government’s factum warns of a “parallel universe of litigation” if UNDRIP gains quasi‑constitutional weight.
- Premier David Eby publicly framed DRIPA’s purpose as avoiding litigation and enabling structured partnerships with First Nations.
- Gitxaała Chief Councillor Linda Innes argued her nation’s consultation expectations have been consistently and clearly communicated.
- First Nations Summit representative Robert Phillips cautioned that proposed DRIPA amendments could reverse several years of joint policy work.
Our Take
British Columbia features heavily in our Policy coverage on project permitting, and a spring 2025 appeal outcome on Indigenous consultation will likely influence how regulators structure early-stage engagement requirements for new mines across the province.
Because this case tests how B.C.’s 2019 DRIPA legislation interacts with mineral tenure and consultation, a precedent here could force operators to revisit risk allocations in option, JV and earn-in agreements for exploration ground in the province.
For projects tagged under ‘Standard/Guideline’ in our database, similar legal inflection points have typically led to interim permitting guidance before final judgments, so proponents in B.C. should watch for short-term procedural changes even ahead of the court’s decision this spring.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


