Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy
    Projects
    Standard/Guideline

    B.C. appeal on Indigenous mining consultation: key permitting impacts for projects

    February 9, 2026|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    B.C. appeal on Indigenous mining consultation: key permitting impacts for projects

    First reported on MINING.com

    30 Second Briefing

    British Columbia has appealed a December 2025 ruling that found its Mineral Tenure Act breaches consultation duties by allowing mineral claims staking on Gitxaała and Ehattesaht territories without prior First Nations engagement. The 3 February filing to the Supreme Court of Canada argues the appeals court misapplied B.C.’s 2019 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) and risks giving UNDRIP “quasi-constitutional status”, creating a “parallel universe of litigation”. Premier David Eby plans DRIPA amendments this spring after talks with First Nations, while leaders including Gitxaała Chief Councillor Linda Innes warn rushed reforms could weaken enforceable rights over exploration permitting.

    Technical Brief

    • DRIPA, enacted in 2019, legally anchors alignment of B.C. statutes with UNDRIP principles.
    • Government’s factum warns of a “parallel universe of litigation” if UNDRIP gains quasi‑constitutional weight.
    • Premier David Eby publicly framed DRIPA’s purpose as avoiding litigation and enabling structured partnerships with First Nations.
    • Gitxaała Chief Councillor Linda Innes argued her nation’s consultation expectations have been consistently and clearly communicated.
    • First Nations Summit representative Robert Phillips cautioned that proposed DRIPA amendments could reverse several years of joint policy work.

    Our Take

    British Columbia features heavily in our Policy coverage on project permitting, and a spring 2025 appeal outcome on Indigenous consultation will likely influence how regulators structure early-stage engagement requirements for new mines across the province.

    Because this case tests how B.C.’s 2019 DRIPA legislation interacts with mineral tenure and consultation, a precedent here could force operators to revisit risk allocations in option, JV and earn-in agreements for exploration ground in the province.

    For projects tagged under ‘Standard/Guideline’ in our database, similar legal inflection points have typically led to interim permitting guidance before final judgments, so proponents in B.C. should watch for short-term procedural changes even ahead of the court’s decision this spring.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners
    Policy
    about 6 hours ago

    Project Vault and US$12bn stockpile: regulatory takeaways for mine planners

    Project Vault will create a US$12 billion US critical minerals stockpile, combining US$1.67 billion in private capital with a US$10 billion Export-Import Bank loan to buy and store materials for automakers, tech firms and other industrial users. Following a Section 232 probe covering the full USGS critical minerals list plus uranium, the administration found imports threaten national security but chose negotiated price floors and trade mechanisms over tariffs. Forthcoming US–Mexico and US–EU–Japan action plans, under the new FORGE framework, will define which minerals are prioritised, how any border-adjusted price floor is calculated, and how rules of origin or downstream products are treated.

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 7 hours ago

    BC investor’s C$500k mining misrepresentation fine: compliance lessons for project teams

    British Columbia investor Varandeep Singh Grewal has agreed to pay C$500,000 and accept a 10‑year ban from acting as a registrant, promoter or securities market consultant after the BC Securities Commission found he facilitated misleading investor relations for a supposed mineral exploration startup. Over two months in 2018, a third‑party IR provider, arranged by Grewal, claimed the company was actively mining, producing minerals and using “state‑of‑the‑art, environmental‑friendly” technology, when it in fact remained purely in the exploration phase with no such infrastructure. The case signals tighter scrutiny of promotional claims around early‑stage mining projects, particularly where production and proprietary technology are asserted without evidence.

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams
    Policy
    about 17 hours ago

    Gateway 3 delays and 5,000 empty homes: regulatory lessons for project teams

    Delays at the Building Safety Regulator’s Gateway 3 stage are linked by law firm Irwin Mitchell to 44 undecided schemes and 5,594 completed higher-risk residential units remaining unoccupied, with one case waiting 550 days against an eight‑week target. Of 158 Gateway 3 applications in 2023, 55 took more than three months for a decision, raising concerns over cashflow impacts on developers and handover timing for residents. The BSR disputes the interpretation, stating no new-build higher-risk building that passed Gateway 2 has yet applied for Gateway 3 and that current cases are mainly transitional legacy projects with significant safety issues.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.