Asbestos-contaminated play sand: risk assessment and remediation notes for engineers
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

First reported on Geoengineer.org – News
30 Second Briefing
Asbestos-contaminated coloured play sand has triggered widespread recalls and temporary closures of schools and preschools across Australia and New Zealand after laboratory tests detected tremolite and chrysotile fibres. Authorities are tracing supply chains for multiple imported sand batches and conducting confirmatory bulk and air sampling, with some sites requiring full playground cordons and controlled removal of loose fill. Geotechnical and environmental consultants are being engaged for asbestos risk assessments, remediation design and validation testing, particularly where sand was used over unsealed subgrades or near drainage lines.
Technical Brief
- Laboratory reports specified tremolite and chrysotile as fibrous contaminants, triggering asbestos regulations rather than general dust controls.
- State work health authorities required immediate isolation of impacted sand pits using barrier mesh and exclusion signage.
- Several education departments mandated asbestos management plans be updated to explicitly include loose imported play materials.
- Air monitoring programmes adopted phase-contrast microscopy screening with transmission electron microscopy confirmation for disputed fibre counts.
- Consultants were instructed to treat sand as friable asbestos waste where fibres were visible under low magnification.
- Disposal routes followed licensed asbestos landfills only, prohibiting reuse as fill or landscaping material off-site.
- Procurement teams began requiring supplier certificates of analysis for asbestos, aligned with national prohibited-import requirements.
- For similar bulk granular imports, risk assessments are now extending beyond quarry source to include colouring and packaging stages.
Our Take
Asbestos and tremolite only appear in a very small subset of our Hazards coverage, signalling that this incident in Australia and New Zealand is an outlier compared with the more routine tailings and ground-failure stories tagged to Projects and Safety.
For operators supplying bulk materials to schools or public works in Australia and New Zealand, this kind of asbestos/tremolite contamination event typically triggers tighter source‑rock characterisation and batch traceability requirements, which can materially raise compliance costs for quarry and sand producers.
Given that asbestos and chrysotile are legacy contaminants often linked to older ultramafic or metamorphic source units, civil and geotechnical practitioners working on new playgrounds or earthworks in these regions are likely to see more stringent geotechnical investigation scopes and laboratory mineralogy checks written into specifications.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


