Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Standard/Guideline
    Projects

    Ørsted Supreme Court tax ruling: implications for offshore survey budgets

    April 17, 2026|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    Ørsted Supreme Court tax ruling: implications for offshore survey budgets

    First reported on New Civil Engineer

    30 Second Briefing

    Ørsted has lost a UK Supreme Court case over whether it could claim tax relief on geotechnical and environmental surveys for offshore wind farms that never progressed to construction. The ruling confirms that expenditure on early-stage site investigation and feasibility work for prospective projects does not qualify as “research and development” for UK tax purposes when no tangible asset is created. Developers may now need to reprice front-end survey campaigns and reconsider how they structure pre-consent ground investigation and design studies.

    Technical Brief

    • Front-end ground investigation campaigns for UK offshore projects now carry higher unrecoverable sunk-cost risk in bid pricing.

    Our Take

    Ørsted’s adverse Supreme Court outcome in the United Kingdom will sharpen cost and risk modelling for early-stage offshore wind surveys, as developers can no longer assume tax relief on large pre-consent investigation campaigns in that jurisdiction.

    With Ørsted also advancing UK assets like the Iceni battery energy storage system near Hornsea 3, as noted in our coverage of Knights Brown’s new Norwich hub, the ruling may push more rigorous separation of survey, development and construction SPVs to manage tax exposure across integrated wind–storage portfolios.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Burnham and regional infrastructure: pipeline certainty lessons for UK project teams
    Policy
    about 21 hours ago

    Burnham and regional infrastructure: pipeline certainty lessons for UK project teams

    Greater regional infrastructure investment under a potential Andy Burnham government must not be funded by cutting London’s capital budgets, BusinessLDN deputy CEO Muniya Barua has warned. She argues that shifting money away from major London schemes—such as upgrades to key commuter rail corridors and strategic road junctions—would weaken national productivity rather than rebalance it. For engineers, the message is that long-term pipeline certainty for both London and regional projects is critical to maintain design capacity, contractor capability and supply-chain investment.

    ICE decarbonisation call: delivery and carbon design impacts for UK engineers
    Policy
    about 21 hours ago

    ICE decarbonisation call: delivery and carbon design impacts for UK engineers

    UK civil engineers are warning that policymakers “aren’t moving fast enough” on decarbonisation after the Climate Change Committee’s latest progress report showed the UK is off track for its sixth carbon budget and 2030 NDC. The Institution of Civil Engineers is pressing for accelerated delivery of low‑carbon infrastructure, including grid reinforcement for renewables, building retrofit at scale and low‑carbon transport schemes. For practitioners, this signals likely tighter embodied‑carbon expectations on materials, more whole‑life carbon assessments and stronger scrutiny of project emissions pathways.

    Nista project oversight push: delivery and risk control takeaways for engineers
    Policy
    about 21 hours ago

    Nista project oversight push: delivery and risk control takeaways for engineers

    The National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (Nista) is seeking a stronger mandate over major project delivery to give long-term certainty for the UK’s built environment amid political instability. Proposals centre on tighter central oversight of scheme selection, funding pipelines and delivery milestones for large transport, energy and water programmes, rather than leaving decisions vulnerable to short-term ministerial changes. For engineers, this would mean more stable multi-year budgets, clearer sequencing of major works and potentially stricter gateway controls on design, risk and cost management.

    Related Industries & Products

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.

    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy