Reed planning reform proposals: key implications for UK project teams and designers
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

First reported on The Construction Index
30 Second Briefing
Government proposals to revise the National Planning Policy Framework include a presumption in favour of housing near railway stations, support for high-rise residential blocks in urban areas, and widening the Building Safety Levy exemption from schemes of 10 homes to 50 homes (or from 30 to 120 student bed spaces). Smaller sites would be exempt from biodiversity net gain rules, and “swift bricks” for nesting swifts are set to be embedded in policy. The 123‑page consultation, posing 225 questions and running to 10 March 2026, keeps national policy non-statutory, prompting mixed views on planning certainty.
Technical Brief
- Consultation document runs to 123 pages and poses 225 detailed questions to stakeholders.
- Consultation window is unusually long, closing on 10 March 2026, affecting project pipeline timing.
- Government explicitly keeps National Planning Policy Framework as non-statutory guidance, not a legal decision basis.
- Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023 powers to make statutory policies are deliberately not activated.
- Steve Reed reiterates target of delivering 1.5 million new homes, framing capacity expectations for local plans.
- Government signals willingness to revisit NPPF legal status if current reforms fail to change decision outcomes.
Our Take
The 1.5 million homes target in England puts this UK Government reform in the same scale bracket as the largest housing-policy items in our Policy category, signalling that planning and levy tweaks will be judged against national supply outcomes rather than incremental local gains.
The proposed widening of Building Safety Levy exemptions for small sites is likely to be closely watched by members of the Federation of Master Builders, as our database shows most SME-focused UK policy coverage clusters around viability of sub‑50 home schemes in the Midlands and North.
With 225 consultation questions over 123 pages and a horizon running to March 2026, this sits at the more complex end of the 44 Policy stories in our coverage, suggesting that responses from bodies like the RTPI and British Property Federation will need significant technical input rather than high-level lobbying alone.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


