Ibrox Stadium redevelopment study: design, safety and phasing notes for engineers
Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

First reported on New Civil Engineer
30 Second Briefing
Rangers Football Club has commissioned a wide‑ranging feasibility study to examine redevelopment options for the 50,817‑capacity Ibrox Stadium in Glasgow, a Category 4 UEFA venue with a 190,000m² site footprint. Consultants are expected to assess structural upgrades to the existing bowl, potential expansion of spectator capacity within current urban constraints, and modernisation of concourses, access routes and hospitality areas. Any scheme will need to address ageing reinforced concrete elements, crowd flow under current safety regulations, and construction phasing to maintain matchday operations.
Technical Brief
- Any redevelopment must preserve emergency egress widths, travel distances and evacuation times under modern crowd models.
- Phasing scenarios will have to maintain segregation of home/away fans and blue‑light access during works.
- Upgrades offer scope to rationalise vomitories, stair cores and concourse layouts to reduce crowd congestion risk.
- Digital crowd‑flow simulations and temporary works planning will be central to proving construction‑stage safety.
Our Take
Within the 72 Infrastructure stories in our database, only a small subset deal with major stadium refurbishments, so any redevelopment at Ibrox Stadium is likely to draw on lessons from recent rail and bridge safety upgrades rather than direct football-venue precedents.
Safety-tagged pieces in our coverage increasingly highlight intrusive structural investigations and phased construction to keep assets operational, which suggests Rangers Football Club may need to plan for complex staging and temporary works if Ibrox is to remain in use during redevelopment.
For UK sports venues comparable to Ibrox Stadium in our database, redevelopment has often triggered upgrades to crowd management, egress routes and fire strategies to current standards, which can drive a significant portion of project cost and programme risk even when the visible works appear modest.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
QCDB-io
Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.


