Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
Built byBoxcut Studio

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Safety

    Former industry veteran joins Coexistence board: land access impacts for SA projects

    November 26, 2025|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Former industry veteran joins Coexistence board: land access impacts for SA projects

    First reported on Australian Mining

    30 Second Briefing

    Former Association of Mining and Exploration Companies South Australian director and 20‑year resources veteran has been appointed to the state’s new Coexistence board, set up to manage land access tensions between miners, farmers and other land users. The board is expected to advise on approvals and conditions for exploration and mining leases, with a focus on coexistence on freehold and pastoral land. For project teams, this signals closer scrutiny of stakeholder engagement, surface access agreements and disturbance footprints in South Australia.

    Technical Brief

    • Board remit likely includes conditioning work programmes, drilling schedules and access tracks to minimise surface risk.
    • Expect formal review of traffic management, fencing and exclusion zones where exploration overlaps cropping or grazing.
    • Coexistence framework will probably tighten requirements for blast vibration, noise and dust limits near homesteads.
    • Governance structure creates a single forum to reconcile mine safety obligations with agricultural WHS duties.
    • Land access disputes may increasingly be resolved via codified protocols rather than ad hoc private agreements.
    • Approvals advice from the board is expected to influence design of low‑impact pads, sumps and camp layouts.
    • Stronger oversight could drive earlier integration of geotechnical risk assessments into landholder consultation material.
    • Similar multi‑stakeholder boards in other jurisdictions have led to more prescriptive rehabilitation and closure conditions.

    Our Take

    Within the 11 Policy stories in our coverage, Australia features frequently in pieces tagged to Safety, signalling that regulators there are using governance structures—like coexistence boards—rather than only prescriptive rules to manage mining-community interfaces.

    For Australian Mining and similar industry bodies, participation in state-level coexistence boards tends to give them early visibility on project constraints, which can materially affect how new Projects are scoped and sequenced, especially around land access and safety obligations.

    Bringing a veteran with 20 years’ resources-sector experience onto a state Coexistence board usually means operational safety practices from large mine sites are fed directly into policy, which can tighten expectations on smaller operators that previously had more informal community arrangements.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Conservatives to scrap Environment Agency and Natural England: risk lens for engineers
    Policy
    1 day ago

    Conservatives to scrap Environment Agency and Natural England: risk lens for engineers

    Conservative Party leaders are preparing an election pledge to abolish the Environment Agency and Natural England, removing the current statutory regulators for flood risk management, main river consents, environmental permits and protected habitats. Scrapping these bodies would affect technical approvals for flood defences, reservoir safety oversight, abstraction licences and environmental impact assessments on major road, rail and energy schemes. Engineers could face a restructured or entirely new permitting regime, with uncertainty over design standards, programme risk and long-term asset maintenance responsibilities.

    ORR cuts third party rail charges: project delivery implications for engineers
    Policy
    4 days ago

    ORR cuts third party rail charges: project delivery implications for engineers

    The Office of Rail and Road has reduced the charges that third parties pay to fund upgrades and maintenance on the UK rail network, aiming to cut project costs for developers and investors. Lower access and investment charges are expected to make it more viable for ports, freight terminals and property-led schemes to finance track, signalling and station enhancements tied to their own developments. For civil and rail engineers, the change could unlock more privately backed schemes and require closer early-stage coordination on asset standards, possession planning and long-term maintenance responsibilities.

    Space miners’ Earth-sized tax problem: policy design notes for project teams
    Policy
    5 days ago

    Space miners’ Earth-sized tax problem: policy design notes for project teams

    Space mining ventures could face a UN-style global tax regime, with Petr Zimčík of NEWTON University proposing a Space Resources Tax Authority linked to COPUOS and a three-stage levy: a small extraction fee, a larger tax at sale or consumption, and final settlement if material enters Earth markets. The core tax would target economic rent only after recovery of capital and operating costs, with thresholds set in a basket-based international accounting unit to neutralise inflation and currency swings. A fixed share of revenue would fund a Global Space Resource Dividend and a separate Global Development Fund, using population, development gaps and space-sector contributions to allocate proceeds without conferring property rights over celestial bodies.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.

    AllGeotechnicalInfrastructureHazardsEnvironmental