Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Simplified.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Standard/Guideline
    Safety

    Federal Government’s AI plan: safety guardrails and gaps explained for engineers

    December 5, 2025|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Federal Government’s AI plan: safety guardrails and gaps explained for engineers

    First reported on Australian Mining Review – News

    30 Second Briefing

    Australia’s national AI plan abandons last year’s proposal for mandatory AI-specific guardrails, instead relying on existing workplace, privacy and safety laws while creating a $30 million AI Safety Institute from 2026 to monitor risks. The approach has split stakeholders, with Greens Senator David Shoebridge warning of “glib assurances”, while the Business Council’s Bran Black calls for a gap analysis before any new regulation. The Federal Government is expected to lean on mining’s AI experience in predictive maintenance, exploration analytics and automation to drive adoption in defence, education and infrastructure.

    Technical Brief

    • More than 1500 Australian AI companies and $10b data centre spend in 2024 set the regulatory context.
    • EU’s AI action plan is explicitly “human-centric” and risk-sensitive, providing a contrasting safety benchmark.
    • The US “Winning the race: America’s AI action plan” prioritises innovation, signalling a looser safety posture.
    • Australia’s plan is framed around “protecting workers” and “works for people”, but without AI-specific statutory duties.
    • Greens Senator David Shoebridge argues existing workplace, privacy and safety laws are not “up to the task”.
    • A $30m AI Safety Institute from 2026 will advise on when “stronger responses” are required, not enforce them.
    • For high‑hazard sectors (mining, tunnelling, heavy civils), reliance on generic WHS law may necessitate company‑level AI safety standards.

    Our Take

    With A$10 billion going into Australian data centres in 2024 and 1,500 local AI companies, any delay in robust guardrails puts mining and resources operators in a position where site-level deployments may outpace sector-specific safety standards or workforce agreements.

    The AI Safety Institute’s start date of 2026 effectively creates a regulatory gap of at least two years from the 2023–25 UK, EU and US action plans, which is likely to push Australian resources majors to benchmark against overseas AI safety frameworks rather than wait for domestic guidance.

    Given the Minerals Council of Australia and ACTU are both named stakeholders, this AI policy debate is set to become a proxy battleground over automation and job design in high-risk environments such as underground mining and remote operations centres, rather than a purely tech-sector issue.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    ISA seabed mining rules: benefit-sharing deadlock explained for project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    ISA seabed mining rules: benefit-sharing deadlock explained for project teams

    Deep seabed mining remains legally blocked after legal scholars Aline Jaeckel and Erik van Doorn argued that the International Seabed Authority cannot approve exploitation in areas like the Clarion-Clipperton Zone until separate benefit-sharing regulations, controlled by the ISA Assembly, are adopted. The ISA’s Finance Committee only produced a first draft benefit-sharing framework in 2024, centred on a Common Heritage Fund, while about 40 countries now support a moratorium and African states oppose using shared funds for remediation. Companies including The Metals Company, Impossible Metals and Lockheed Martin are advancing CCZ plans despite this regulatory deadlock.

    UK boom lifts anti-dumping probe: procurement and safety notes for engineers
    Policy
    11 days ago

    UK boom lifts anti-dumping probe: procurement and safety notes for engineers

    An anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation has been opened by the UK Trade Remedies Authority into Chinese-made boom lifts, following a complaint from UK manufacturer Niftylift. The probe covers telescopic and articulated boom lifts, including sub-assemblies, with working heights of 6 m and above, such as models like the Dingli BT44HRT now entering the UK market. Scissor lifts, forklifts, vertical mast lifts, mobile self-propelled cranes and motor vehicles with integrated boom or scissor assemblies are explicitly excluded, so procurement teams must check machine classifications carefully.

    Engineers Against Poverty chair: governance, carbon and cost lessons for project teams
    Policy
    11 days ago

    Engineers Against Poverty chair: governance, carbon and cost lessons for project teams

    Engineers Against Poverty chair Richard Threlfall calls for the engineering, infrastructure and construction profession to lead on cutting whole‑life emissions and controlling capital cost overruns in major civils programmes. He argues that effective infrastructure governance must move beyond compliance to active stewardship of carbon, cost and social outcomes, with engineers shaping procurement models and performance metrics rather than leaving them to financiers and policymakers. For practitioners, this signals greater responsibility for transparent cost baselines, carbon accounting and value-for-money evidence on large public works.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Tunnelling

    Specialised solutions for tunnelling projects including grout mix design, hydrogeological analysis, and quality control.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy