Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Simplified.

© 2025 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Standard/Guideline
    Safety

    Federal Government’s AI plan: safety guardrails and gaps explained for engineers

    December 5, 2025|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Federal Government’s AI plan: safety guardrails and gaps explained for engineers

    First reported on Australian Mining Review – News

    30 Second Briefing

    Australia’s national AI plan abandons last year’s proposal for mandatory AI-specific guardrails, instead relying on existing workplace, privacy and safety laws while creating a $30 million AI Safety Institute from 2026 to monitor risks. The approach has split stakeholders, with Greens Senator David Shoebridge warning of “glib assurances”, while the Business Council’s Bran Black calls for a gap analysis before any new regulation. The Federal Government is expected to lean on mining’s AI experience in predictive maintenance, exploration analytics and automation to drive adoption in defence, education and infrastructure.

    Technical Brief

    • More than 1500 Australian AI companies and $10b data centre spend in 2024 set the regulatory context.
    • EU’s AI action plan is explicitly “human-centric” and risk-sensitive, providing a contrasting safety benchmark.
    • The US “Winning the race: America’s AI action plan” prioritises innovation, signalling a looser safety posture.
    • Australia’s plan is framed around “protecting workers” and “works for people”, but without AI-specific statutory duties.
    • Greens Senator David Shoebridge argues existing workplace, privacy and safety laws are not “up to the task”.
    • A $30m AI Safety Institute from 2026 will advise on when “stronger responses” are required, not enforce them.
    • For high‑hazard sectors (mining, tunnelling, heavy civils), reliance on generic WHS law may necessitate company‑level AI safety standards.

    Our Take

    With A$10 billion going into Australian data centres in 2024 and 1,500 local AI companies, any delay in robust guardrails puts mining and resources operators in a position where site-level deployments may outpace sector-specific safety standards or workforce agreements.

    The AI Safety Institute’s start date of 2026 effectively creates a regulatory gap of at least two years from the 2023–25 UK, EU and US action plans, which is likely to push Australian resources majors to benchmark against overseas AI safety frameworks rather than wait for domestic guidance.

    Given the Minerals Council of Australia and ACTU are both named stakeholders, this AI policy debate is set to become a proxy battleground over automation and job design in high-risk environments such as underground mining and remote operations centres, rather than a purely tech-sector issue.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    FMB updates builder contract forms: Building Safety Act duties clarified for SMEs
    Policy
    about 7 hours ago

    FMB updates builder contract forms: Building Safety Act duties clarified for SMEs

    The Federation of Master Builders has overhauled its builder contract templates to reflect the Building Safety Act 2022, explicitly allocating duty holder roles and clarifying who carries design, construction management and compliance responsibilities where architects and engineers decline principal designer duties due to insurance limits. Authored by contract specialist Sarah Fox, the new forms run to just 14–15 pages versus typical 80+ page industry contracts and are free for FMB members. For contractors on small to mid‑scale projects, this offers a practical route to documenting liability, reducing disputes and aligning site practice with the new safety regime.

    Gitxaala v. British Columbia: mineral claims staking implications for project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    Gitxaala v. British Columbia: mineral claims staking implications for project teams

    British Columbia’s Court of Appeal has ruled in Gitxaala v. British Columbia that the province’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) incorporates UNDRIP and creates legally enforceable obligations, overturning a 2023 Supreme Court finding that DRIPA was not justiciable. The court held that B.C.’s automatic online mineral claim-staking system under the Mineral Tenure Act, used to grant claims on Banks Island between 2018 and 2020, is inconsistent with UNDRIP because it provides no opportunity for prior consultation. All B.C. mining-related statutes and regulations must now be interpreted as consistent with UNDRIP, signalling tighter consultation requirements at the mineral claims stage.

    Nuclear taskforce implementation plan: regulatory impacts for UK project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    Nuclear taskforce implementation plan: regulatory impacts for UK project teams

    Ed Miliband has confirmed the government will deliver a full implementation plan within three months for the Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce’s recent review recommendations, signalling a rapid timetable for regulatory change across the UK nuclear programme. The taskforce’s work is expected to affect licensing and consenting pathways for new large-scale reactors and small modular reactors, with direct implications for design approvals, site investigations and construction sequencing. Civil and geotechnical teams on nuclear projects should anticipate tighter programme constraints and potential revisions to safety case documentation and regulatory interfaces in early 2026.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Tunnelling

    Specialised solutions for tunnelling projects including grout mix design, hydrogeological analysis, and quality control.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.