Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Standard/Guideline
    Projects

    ECITB levy approved by parliament: funding, exemptions and skills impact for engineers

    July 15, 2026|

    Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

    ECITB levy approved by parliament: funding, exemptions and skills impact for engineers

    First reported on The Construction Index

    30 Second Briefing

    Parliament has approved the Engineering Construction Industry Training Board’s 2026 Industrial Training Levy Order, maintaining levy rates at 0.33% of off-site payroll and 1.2% of on-site payroll, expected to raise £137.9m for 2026–28 and support an estimated additional 40,000 workers. Employers with off-site wage bills under £1m and on-site wage bills under £275,000 remain exempt but still eligible for ECITB training grants, preserving support for SMEs. The levy will be collected in 2027–29, with a separate decision on a proposed ECITB–CITB merger due later this year.

    Technical Brief

    • Statutory Instrument “Industrial Training Levy (ECITB) Order 2026” has been affirmed by both Houses, unopposed.
    • Levy applies to engineering construction wage bills relating to 2026–28 but is payable in 2027–29.
    • Employers remain exempt if off-site annual wage bill is under £1m, or on-site under £275,000.
    • Exempt employers that are in-scope to ECITB still qualify for ECITB-funded training grants.
    • Ministers explicitly link levy-funded skills to delivery of major energy and industrial infrastructure across Great Britain.
    • Government statements tie ECITB’s role to clean energy, energy security and wider economic growth objectives.
    • Industry consultation in November saw engineering construction companies “overwhelmingly” back the proposed levy structure.

    Our Take

    The ECITB levy framework for 2026–2028 underpins skills initiatives already flagged in our coverage, such as the forecast 47% rise in welding demand and associated upskilling programmes, signalling that levy payers in Great Britain will be funding very specific capacity gaps rather than generic training.

    The linkage to the Energy Transition Skills Hub and ECITB-backed schemes like Aurora’s “Military to Wind” pilot suggests that, for UK engineering contractors, a material share of levy-funded training is likely to be steered towards low‑carbon and offshore wind skills, which may influence workforce planning on major energy and infrastructure projects from 2026 onwards.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Burnham’s North Sea oil and gas fields decision: asset life and P&A lens for engineers
    Policy
    about 4 hours ago

    Burnham’s North Sea oil and gas fields decision: asset life and P&A lens for engineers

    Prime minister Andy Burnham must decide whether to approve continued oil and gas production from existing North Sea fields such as Rosebank and Cambo or honour Labour’s manifesto pledge to halt new extraction. Any phase-out would affect hundreds of existing offshore platforms, subsea pipelines and onshore terminals designed around long-term reservoir depletion schedules and decommissioning plans extending into the 2040s. The decision will directly shape future investment in offshore structural integrity work, well plugging and abandonment campaigns, and potential reuse of platforms and pipelines for CO₂ transport and storage.

    Reshoring minerals as a processing bottleneck: project finance lessons for engineers
    Policy
    about 5 hours ago

    Reshoring minerals as a processing bottleneck: project finance lessons for engineers

    Western efforts to reshore critical minerals risk stalling because the bottleneck is processing, not ore supply, with China still refining roughly 50% of global copper and about 90% of rare earths, mining lawyer Rebecca Seidl-Inglesby of Baker Botts warns. She notes a typical copper mine can take 17–30 years from discovery to US production, while new refineries face 18–24‑month product qualification lags, so governments are increasingly stepping in as commercial counterparties via price floors, 10‑year offtakes and equity, as seen in the Pentagon’s multi‑billion‑dollar MP Materials deal. Projects now win funding less on geology than on integrated routes from deposit to refinery and creditworthy offtaker, with capital structures clean enough to pass foreign‑investment scrutiny.

    Critical minerals at the port, not the mine: logistics lessons for project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    Critical minerals at the port, not the mine: logistics lessons for project teams

    China’s Belt and Road strategy is consolidating control over critical minerals not at the pit but along export corridors, exemplified by the US$20 billion Simandou joint venture that couples a multi‑hundred‑kilometre heavy‑haul railway with the new deep‑water port of Morabaya to channel Guinean iron ore directly to Chinese industry. In Africa’s Copperbelt, where 15% of global copper reserves and most known cobalt resources sit thousands of kilometres from deep‑water ports, foreign‑financed rail and terminals effectively dictate whether concentrates move as raw exports or into local refining. Djibouti’s Doraleh Multipurpose Port, 85% funded by China and offering deep‑water berths suitable for naval deployment, illustrates how dual‑use port ownership can weaponise logistics and blunt resource‑nationalist policies such as export bans on unprocessed lithium, graphite, copper and cobalt.

    Related Industries & Products

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.

    AllGeotechnicalInfrastructureHazardsEnvironmental