Quarry firms slam planning reforms: NPPF mineral supply risks for project teams
Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

First reported on The Construction Index
30 Second Briefing
Quarry operators warn that proposed revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework published on 16 December strip out references to maintaining a “steady and adequate supply” of aggregates and no longer describe mineral supply as “essential”. The Mineral Products Association says this weakens long‑standing minerals policy just as permitted aggregate reserves are already in long‑term decline despite historically low sales. Executive director Mark Russell argues the NPPF should include a clear national statement of need for construction aggregates, industrial sands and building stone, with consultation running until March 2026.
Technical Brief
- Draft NPPF text published 16 December removes long‑standing “steady and adequate supply” aggregates wording.
- Mineral Products Association (MPA) warns reforms weaken minerals planning just as reserves are already declining.
- MPA links lack of mineral planning reform to constraints on future housebuilding and infrastructure delivery capacity.
- Executive director Mark Russell stresses domestic extraction is the UK’s largest material flow by tonnage.
- MPA argues downgraded wording will deter long‑term capital investment in new quarries and extensions.
- Concern centres on construction aggregates, industrial sands and building stone as core inputs to growth projects.
- Consultation on the revised NPPF text runs until March 2026, giving a two‑year response window.
Our Take
Within the 55 Policy stories in our database, only a handful touch directly on construction aggregates and industrial sands, so the Mineral Products Association’s pushback here stands out as one of the few pieces linking UK planning rules to bulk materials security rather than metals or energy minerals.
Because the NPPF consultation runs until March 2026, UK quarry operators supplying construction aggregates and building stone face nearly a full planning cycle of uncertainty, which is likely to complicate reserve replacement decisions and long-lead plant investments.
Compared with most policy coverage that centres on critical metals or international mining jurisdictions, this UK-focused piece highlights that domestic planning risk for low-margin bulk materials can be just as material to infrastructure delivery as the higher-profile issues around nickel or copper supply seen in other recent items.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


