Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
Built byBoxcut Studio

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Product

    McKinsey on AI paying off in mining: production and cost lessons for engineers

    September 30, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    McKinsey on AI paying off in mining: production and cost lessons for engineers

    First reported on MINING.com

    30 Second Briefing

    Fifteen of 19 major miners tracked by McKinsey reported third‑quarter financial gains from AI, with the consultancy estimating potential EBITDA uplifts of 10%–15% from roughly 5% higher production and 10% lower C1 cash costs. The strongest evidence is in processing, where AI-driven mill and flotation control has reached “proven in the P&L” status, with ore-blending, stockpile optimisation and shutdown planning also rated proven, while leaching, water‑and‑reagent optimisation and most mine planning, dispatch and exploration tools remain emerging or aspirational. McKinsey’s Ferran Pujol and Freeport-McMoRan’s Ravi Malladi stressed that value depends on robust data flows, condition-based maintenance and embedded site-level tech teams, not just standalone pilots.

    Technical Brief

    • McKinsey’s top “proven in P&L” rating is limited to AI mill and flotation control plus shutdown optimisation.
    • Computer vision, ore-blending and stockpile optimisation, and predictive maintenance for fleets/plants are only “proven”, one tier lower.
    • Leaching and water‑and‑reagent optimisation tools are still classed as “emerging”, with incomplete deployment or quantified benefits.
    • Eight mine-planning and operations tools – including scheduling, drill‑and‑blast, dispatch and mixed‑fleet autonomy – remain emerging or aspirational.
    • All three exploration applications – AI targeting, automated core logging and grade control – are still only “emerging”.
    • Digital twins of mines and plants achieve “proven” status but lack disclosed P&L‑linked figures.
    • Data logistics are a hard constraint: missed oil samples or unrecorded lab results nullify predictive models’ usefulness.
    • McKinsey’s 70‑70‑70 rule recommends 70% in‑house tech staff, 70% builders, and 70% drawn from senior ranks.
    • Governance model assigns one executive P&L ownership for AI, with COO responsible for cross‑site replication and CFO for isolating AI’s financial contribution.

    Our Take

    McKinsey’s separate work on commodity trading volatility, which highlights value concentrating among firms with advanced AI and tight control of physical copper and gold flows, suggests that the 10–15% EBITDA uplift cited here will likely accrue first to miners that can integrate production-side AI with trading and marketing functions.

    With only 7% of energy and materials respondents having scaled AI agents in manufacturing, yet 89% using AI in at least one function, there is a wide implementation gap that gives early movers such as large copper and critical minerals producers in the Americas a temporary cost and productivity advantage before AI tools commoditise.

    In our mining database, McKinsey appears most often in pieces tied to Latin American copper and critical minerals M&A and strategy, so its 70-70-70 in-house tech talent rule is likely to be most actionable for larger operators like Freeport-McMoRan and Ivanhoe Mines that already have the scale to internalise data science and software engineering teams.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Trump’s Venezuela gold push: due‑diligence bottlenecks explained for mine teams
    Mining
    about 3 hours ago

    Trump’s Venezuela gold push: due‑diligence bottlenecks explained for mine teams

    Hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Venezuelan gold flown into the US under a Trafigura–Minerven deal backed by President Trump and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum is sitting idle because refiners refuse to process it without proof it meets responsible-sourcing standards. The gold, including about $100 million shipped within hours of the March signing, comes from guarded Minerven underground mines where small-scale producers reportedly pay protection money to the Tren de Guayana gang. Similar deals by Heeney Capital and Mercuria, targeting up to $2.2 billion a year in Venezuelan mineral exports, face the same due‑diligence bottleneck.

    Mining Forum: Friedland’s I-ROX comminution push – energy and recovery lens for engineers
    Mining
    about 3 hours ago

    Mining Forum: Friedland’s I-ROX comminution push – energy and recovery lens for engineers

    Robert Friedland is pushing to replace conventional SAG and ball mills with I-Pulse’s I-ROX pulsed-power comminution, which stores electricity then releases nanosecond–microsecond bursts to fracture ore internally along mineral boundaries, with projected energy cuts of up to 80% and about 5% higher metal recoveries. A 2,500 m² I-ROX research centre in Toulouse is testing Kamoa-Kakula copper ore and tailings, while I-Pulse has also secured a US$250 million CHIPS Act award for silicon-carbide semiconductors. The same platform underlies G-Pulse drilling, claimed to triple penetration rates and extend bit life sixfold, to be trialled on the Millungera Basin geothermal project in Queensland.

    Lake Resources’ Kachi lithium project: DIA approval and FEED lens for engineers
    Mining
    about 3 hours ago

    Lake Resources’ Kachi lithium project: DIA approval and FEED lens for engineers

    Lake Resources has secured the key Environmental Impact Declaration for its Kachi lithium brine project in Catamarca, Argentina, clearing the project to enter front-end engineering design for a 25,000 tpa lithium carbonate equivalent facility using Lilac Solutions’ direct lithium extraction process and prior engineering work with Hatch. The DIA confirms compliance with provincial environmental and social standards, imposes a 200 m surficial exclusion zone around the lagoon shoreline, and sets pre‑operations obligations. Lake has also committed $1 million to Catamarca’s Mining Royalty Trust Fund, to be paid between October 2026 and June 2027 for local infrastructure.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    AllGeotechnicalInfrastructureHazardsEnvironmental