Kinross Gold Bald Mountain fatalities: safety and cost lessons for mine teams
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell

First reported on MINING.com
30 Second Briefing
Two contractor employees from TJS Welding were killed in separate 3 Sept incidents at Kinross Gold’s Bald Mountain mine in Nevada, one struck by a failed truck-bed liner rigging and the other by a pipe that slipped off a jack, prompting mine-wide safety stand-downs while MSHA investigations continue. Kinross’ third-quarter attributable production fell 16% to 424,693 gold-equivalent ounces and all-in sustaining costs rose 20% to $1,947/oz, driving a 59% drop in attributable free cash flow to C$394.8 million despite a 23% higher realised gold price of $4,249/oz.
Technical Brief
- MSHA’s preliminary notices identify failure mechanisms as rigging breakage during truck-bed liner change and loss of pipe support from a jack.
- Likely investigation focus includes rigging design factors of safety, inspection regimes, and compatibility with liner mass and geometry.
- Pipe-jacking incident analysis will centre on jack capacity, cribbing/blocking arrangements, redundancy of supports, and exclusion zones.
- Monitoring and remediation will probably emphasise pre-task risk assessments, lift plans, lock-out/tag-out, and supervisor sign-off for non-routine maintenance.
- Industry-wide, similar truck maintenance and pipe-handling tasks may see tightened standards for lifting gear certification and contractor training.
Our Take
Kinross Gold already has elevated all‑in sustaining costs and a 59% year‑on‑year free cash flow decline, so MSHA scrutiny after the Bald Mountain fatalities could further constrain capital flexibility for projects like Great Bear and Round Mountain’s stage X that are currently advancing ahead of plan.
Our database shows several recent Kinross pieces centred on the high‑capex Lobo‑Marte build in Chile; any perception of systemic safety or contractor‑management weaknesses in the USA may attract closer attention from Chilean regulators as that project moves through the Environmental Impact Assessment System.
With Kinross committing to return 50% of free cash flow to shareholders while also lifting capital spending by 43%, a serious safety incident at a core US gold asset raises the likelihood that future project sequencing or ramp‑ups (notably at Great Bear and Curlew in Ontario and Washington state) will be paced more conservatively to demonstrate improved risk control.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.


