Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
Built byBoxcut Studio

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Streamlined.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Projects
    Sustainability

    Coal bank financing near $117bn: risk and project signals for engineers

    September 30, 2026|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Coal bank financing near $117bn: risk and project signals for engineers

    First reported on MINING.com

    30 Second Briefing

    Global coal financing has held near $117 billion a year since COP26, with Urgewald tracking $467 billion in loans and underwriting from 744 banks to thermal coal companies between 2022 and 2025, 62% of it from Chinese lenders and 14% from US banks. EU-headquartered banks cut annual coal financing 46% to $2.6 billion by 2025, while UK banks increased support 17%, led by Barclays at $5.7 billion over four years and a 34% annual rise to $1.6 billion. In contrast, Chinese annual coal financing climbed to $75 billion, US banks to $16.7 billion, and South Korean banks more than doubled exposure to $1.75 billion, signalling capital is concentrating in jurisdictions with weaker coal policies.

    Technical Brief

    • Urgewald’s dataset covers 744 commercial banks financing companies across the thermal coal value chain.
    • EU-headquartered banks cut coal financing from $4.8 billion in 2022 to $2.6 billion in 2025.
    • Barclays’ cumulative $5.7 billion over four years makes it the largest European coal financier.
    • HSBC more than doubled annual coal financing to $414 million over the period.
    • NatWest halved coal exposure after committing to phase out coal lending in the UK by 2024.
    • Malaysian banks’ coal financing fell 88% to $92 million in 2025 after new coal restrictions.
    • Thai, Taiwanese and Indian banks reduced coal financing by 74%, 53% and 19% respectively.
    • Japan’s coal financing dipped to $5.9 billion in 2024 then rebounded to $6.8 billion in 2025.
    • Three megabanks—Mizuho, MUFG and SMFG—accounted for 80% of Japanese coal financing.
    • India added 88 GW of solar and wind versus 14 GW new coal capacity over two years.

    Our Take

    Glencore’s continued prominence in coal, including at the Cerrejón mine in Colombia, sits alongside its push into critical minerals and battery recycling in other recent pieces, signalling that large diversified traders are managing parallel ‘sunset’ coal and ‘sunrise’ energy-transition portfolios rather than exiting coal outright.

    The concentration of coal financing among major US and Asian lenders such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Mizuho Financial Group and MUFG means that any future tightening of internal coal policies at just a handful of banks could materially affect funding costs for new coal capacity in Asia, where most pipeline projects sit.

    Within our 114 Policy stories, coal and thermal coal repeatedly appear in contexts where banks’ public sustainability pledges diverge from actual lending, suggesting that project sponsors in countries like India and Indonesia can still access sizeable debt for coal build-out even as solar and wind capacity additions accelerate on the ground.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    Cancel at any time.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    Caterpillar challenges UK excavator tariffs: pricing and supply impacts for project teams
    Policy
    about 6 hours ago

    Caterpillar challenges UK excavator tariffs: pricing and supply impacts for project teams

    Caterpillar has launched a High Court challenge against the UK Trade Remedies Authority over an 18.81% anti-dumping duty on its Chinese-built midsized and heavy-duty excavators, imposed for five years following a complaint by JCB. Lawyers for Caterpillar told Mr Justice Richards that the duty is so high the firm has stopped exporting the affected machines from China to the UK and argued the TRA wrongly treated higher UK export prices as dumping by inflating assumed costs and profits. Counsel for the TRA countered that state-subsidised inputs such as cheap steel and electricity create a “particular market situation” justifying the tariff.

    Europe stockpiling critical minerals: processing gaps and design lessons for engineers
    Policy
    1 day ago

    Europe stockpiling critical minerals: processing gaps and design lessons for engineers

    Europe’s RESourceEU plan to stockpile critical raw materials risks filling warehouses with concentrates and scrap that EU industry cannot directly use, such as tungsten concentrate instead of ammonium paratungstate or magnet-grade rare earth alloys. Nicholas Vafeas argues that the Critical Raw Materials Act’s 2030 target for 40% EU processing capacity will be undermined if procurement is judged only on tonnes, price and delivery speed, favouring refined imports over domestic plants. He calls for stockpile design that underpins European and partner-country processing (e.g. Zambia, Namibia), integrates recycling flows, and uses EU purchasing power to lock in diversified, end-to-end processing routes rather than just raw material supply.

    M5 closures challenged in Parliament: traffic management impacts for engineers
    Policy
    1 day ago

    M5 closures challenged in Parliament: traffic management impacts for engineers

    Frequent closures on the M5 motorway have been challenged in Parliament, with MPs pressing the Department for Transport and National Highways to justify disruption levels and adopt new traffic management measures. Calls centre on reviewing incident response protocols and planned works coordination to keep key junctions and long-distance freight corridors open for longer. For civil and traffic engineers, any policy shift could affect lane closure durations, night‑time possession strategies and design of future maintenance schemes on this strategic route.

    Related Industries & Products

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    CMRR-io

    Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.

    HYDROGEO-io

    Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.

    GEODB-io

    Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.

    AllGeotechnicalInfrastructureHazardsEnvironmental