OECD critical minerals traceability report: risk-based lessons for project teams
Reviewed by Joe Ashwell
First reported on MINING.com
30 Second Briefing
Better traceability of critical minerals such as lithium and nickel is needed to manage operational and governance risks in complex supply chains, with the OECD report flagging fragmented company-level systems, low adoption by miners, and opaque transnational ownership structures in Indonesian and Philippine nickel. Case studies of lithium from Argentina and Chile show heavy dependence on Chinese processing and major data gaps, limiting visibility on foreign upstream ownership despite existing tools like SIMBARA, LME responsible-sourcing rules and local audits. The OECD proposes a phased, risk-based approach: short-term use of current supplier mapping and bilateral mineral agreements, medium-term closure of data gaps via traders, exchanges and smelters, and long-term cross-border data sharing and aligned battery standards through platforms such as the G7 Critical Minerals Action Plan, FORGE and RESourceEU.
Technical Brief
- Traders report the highest deployment of traceability systems; mining operators report the lowest implementation rates.
- Company-built, proprietary traceability tools dominate, limiting interoperability and obscuring ultimate control of upstream assets.
- Confidentiality concerns, supplier power imbalances and poor data quality are cited as key implementation barriers.
- Current practice leans on supply-chain mapping, third-party audits and mass-balance accounting rather than physical material tracking.
- Indonesia’s SIMBARA production-tracking system and London Metal Exchange responsible-sourcing rules are identified as core building blocks.
- Local audit schemes and voluntary sustainability initiatives in Indonesian and Philippine nickel provide partial asset and ownership visibility.
- Trade data show Argentine and Chilean lithium exports heavily routed to Chinese processors, complicating upstream–midstream linkage.
- OECD’s roadmap anticipates independent mineral testing and recycled-content tracking emerging only after medium-term data gaps are closed.
Our Take
OECD appears in both this traceability piece and our earlier coverage on mining productivity, signalling that the organisation is increasingly shaping not just economic benchmarking but also operational standards for critical minerals such as lithium and nickel.
With Indonesia, the Philippines, Argentina, Chile and China all cited, this traceability push intersects with jurisdictions that already dominate upstream supply for critical minerals in our database, which likely means new reporting expectations will land first on operators in these regions rather than on downstream refiners or OEMs.
The London Metal Exchange’s involvement is notable given our broader Policy corpus, as exchange-level requirements on critical minerals can translate abstract G7 or OECD guidance into immediate listing, warehousing and warrant rules that miners and traders must comply with to maintain market access.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
Construction
Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.