Chile’s Senate is reviewing a cross‑party bill to create a dedicated legal regime for critical minerals, adding standards for management, information, traceability and operational continuity across the full value chain without amending core mining laws. The draft defines critical minerals as lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, copper, rare earths, molybdenum, rhenium, antimony, selenium, silicon, tellurium and indium, all tied to batteries, electrification and solar technologies. For operators, the shift signals tighter oversight on processing and supply‑chain transparency rather than new concession rules.

Mining royalties and payroll tax are again propping up the Northern Territory’s 2026–27 budget, with Treasury forecasts heavily reliant on existing operations such as McArthur River Mine and the Gove bauxite transition. Industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia’s NT division are pushing for stronger incentives, calling for accelerated depreciation, streamlined approvals under the Territory’s Mineral Titles Act, and more funding for regional roads and power. The debate centres on whether current fiscal settings can attract new critical minerals projects in remote areas with high logistics and energy costs.

Construction in the UK has been formally classified as a “high-risk” sector for modern slavery in a new national report, alongside small cash-based businesses such as vape shops, barbers and hand car washes. The designation points to particular vulnerability in labour-intensive, subcontractor-heavy supply chains on building sites, including temporary works, groundworks and finishing trades where migrant and agency labour are common. Contractors can expect closer scrutiny of right-to-work checks, labour agency practices and tier-2/3 subcontractor oversight on major infrastructure and building projects.