The US and India have signed a bilateral critical minerals framework, building on February’s launch of the Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement (FORGE) in Washington, to secure mining and processing supply chains against single-source monopolies and coercive market practices. India, which officially designates 30 critical minerals and holds an estimated 13 million tonnes of monazite, currently produces only copper, graphite, phosphorous and titanium at scale, signalling substantial greenfield and processing opportunities. Parallel Quad and prospective Russia pacts position India as a multi-aligned hub for rare earths and battery-metal projects.

The Climate Change Committee is for the first time proposing a national blueprint of climate adaptation targets to manage UK climate risks, moving beyond the current focus on net zero mitigation. Draft proposals point to sector‑specific metrics for infrastructure, such as maximum tolerable flood risk for critical assets, heat‑resilience standards for rail and highways, and performance thresholds for drainage and coastal defences under UKCP18 scenarios. Civil and geotechnical engineers should expect future investment cases and design codes to be benchmarked explicitly against these quantified adaptation targets.

Rwanda-backed M23 rebels controlling coltan-rich Rubaya in eastern DRC are seeking to sell tantalum, tin and tungsten directly to the United States, pitching themselves to the Trump administration as a strategic mineral supplier. Rubaya’s mines, under M23 control since April 2024, produce about 15% of global coltan and are estimated by Global Witness to generate roughly $800,000 per month for the group. Any US engagement would collide with existing DRC–US strategic partnership commitments, sanctions on Rwanda’s army, and conflict-mineral certification regimes.