From proof of concept to proof of value in mining: design notes for engineers
Reviewed by Tom Sullivan
First reported on Australian Mining
30 Second Briefing
Technology trials in mining are being reframed from simple proof of concept (PoC) exercises – which only test whether a tool works technically, such as an AI drill-optimisation algorithm or a new fleet-management platform – to proof of value (PoV) programmes that quantify impacts on KPIs like cost per tonne, unplanned downtime, and recovery. PoV design typically hard-wires baselines, control groups, and production-scale timeframes into trials, rather than short, isolated pilots on a single loader or crusher line. For engineers, the shift means specifying measurable value hypotheses up front and integrating trials with existing dispatch, SCADA, and planning systems.
Technical Brief
- PoV trials are structured around explicit financial metrics such as NPV uplift and payback period.
- Vendors are expected to pre-define value levers (e.g. cycle time, dilution, rehandle) tied to site KPIs.
- Trial scopes increasingly include integration effort and change-management cost as part of value calculation.
- Data-quality requirements are tightened, with PoV entry criteria specifying minimum sensor uptime and timestamp accuracy.
- Governance often shifts to joint steering committees with operations, finance and IT signing off value claims.
- Contract structures move towards outcome-based or gainshare models, contingent on independently verified PoV results.
- Unsuccessful PoV outcomes are being used to refine digital roadmaps, not just to reject specific products.
- For similar projects, PoV framing tends to shorten decision cycles by clarifying “scale-or-stop” criteria upfront.
Our Take
Australian Mining appears frequently in our 1192 Mining stories as a platform for operational case studies, so a ‘proof of value’ framing here is likely aimed at helping Australian operators move digital or automation pilots into full-scale deployment rather than just showcasing technology.
The push for one million ounces of gold annually in Victoria by 2035, highlighted in the 22 May 2026 piece, suggests that projects in Australia which can demonstrate clear value beyond proof-of-concept—especially around productivity and cost—will be better positioned to attract capital in a tightening exploration and development pipeline.
Our database shows several Australian Mining items linking contractors and service providers to larger EPC-style packages and post-closure work; a stronger emphasis on proof of value will likely favour products that integrate cleanly into these bundled offerings rather than stand-alone niche tools.
Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.
Related Articles
Related Industries & Products
Mining
Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.
CMRR-io
Streamline coal mine roof stability assessments with our cloud-based CMRR software featuring automated calculations, multi-scenario analysis, and collaborative workflows.
HYDROGEO-io
Comprehensive hydrogeological testing platform for managing, analysing, and reporting on packer tests, lugeon values, and hydraulic conductivity assessments.
GEODB-io
Centralised geotechnical data management solution for storing, accessing, and analysing all your site investigation and material testing data.