Geomechanics.io

  • Free Tools
Sign UpLog In
AllGeotechnicalMiningInfrastructureMaterialsHazardsEnvironmentalSoftwarePolicy

Geomechanics.io

Geomechanics, Simplified.

© 2026 Geomechanics.io. All rights reserved.

Geomechanics.io

CMRR-ioGEODB-ioHYDROGEO-ioQCDB-ioFree Tools & CalculatorsBlogLatest Industry News

Industries

MiningConstructionTunnelling

Company

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyLinkedIn
    Safety
    Standard/Guideline

    Building Safety Regulator delays: risk and cost takeaways for façade engineers

    December 11, 2025|

    Reviewed by Tom Sullivan

    Building Safety Regulator delays: risk and cost takeaways for façade engineers

    First reported on The Construction Index

    30 Second Briefing

    A cross-party House of Lords Built Environment Committee warns that delays in the Building Safety Regulator’s gateway approval processes are stalling cladding remediation on high‑rise residential blocks. Peers say leaseholders are facing rising interim costs for waking watches, higher insurance premiums and extended scaffolding hire while schemes wait for sign‑off. The committee presses the government and BSR to streamline case handling and resource the regulator adequately so life‑critical façade works can proceed at pace.

    Technical Brief

    • Lords Built Environment Committee scrutinised the Building Safety Regulator’s performance under the post‑Grenfell building safety regime.
    • Peers focused on the regulator’s role at the new “gateway” approval stages for higher‑risk residential buildings.
    • The committee’s concern centres on life‑safety–critical façade remediation, particularly combustible cladding systems on tall residential blocks.
    • Evidence to the committee referenced prolonged pre‑construction approval periods before façade removal and replacement can legally proceed.
    • Lords questioned whether the regulator has sufficient technical staff and fire engineering expertise to process complex cases.
    • They also queried whether current guidance and requirements for façade design submissions are overly prescriptive or ambiguous.
    • For dutyholders, the scrutiny signals likely pressure for clearer gateway documentation standards and more predictable approval timeframes.

    Geotechnical Software for Modern Teams

    Centralise site data, logs, and lab results with GEODB-io, CMRR-io, and HYDROGEO-io.

    No credit card required.

    • Save and export unlimited calculations
    • Advanced data visualisation
    • Generate professional PDF reports
    • Cloud storage for all your projects

    Prepared by collating external sources, AI-assisted tools, and Geomechanics.io’s proprietary mining database, then reviewed for technical accuracy & edited by our geotechnical team.

    Related Articles

    ISA seabed mining rules: benefit-sharing deadlock explained for project teams
    Policy
    3 days ago

    ISA seabed mining rules: benefit-sharing deadlock explained for project teams

    Deep seabed mining remains legally blocked after legal scholars Aline Jaeckel and Erik van Doorn argued that the International Seabed Authority cannot approve exploitation in areas like the Clarion-Clipperton Zone until separate benefit-sharing regulations, controlled by the ISA Assembly, are adopted. The ISA’s Finance Committee only produced a first draft benefit-sharing framework in 2024, centred on a Common Heritage Fund, while about 40 countries now support a moratorium and African states oppose using shared funds for remediation. Companies including The Metals Company, Impossible Metals and Lockheed Martin are advancing CCZ plans despite this regulatory deadlock.

    UK boom lifts anti-dumping probe: procurement and safety notes for engineers
    Policy
    11 days ago

    UK boom lifts anti-dumping probe: procurement and safety notes for engineers

    An anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation has been opened by the UK Trade Remedies Authority into Chinese-made boom lifts, following a complaint from UK manufacturer Niftylift. The probe covers telescopic and articulated boom lifts, including sub-assemblies, with working heights of 6 m and above, such as models like the Dingli BT44HRT now entering the UK market. Scissor lifts, forklifts, vertical mast lifts, mobile self-propelled cranes and motor vehicles with integrated boom or scissor assemblies are explicitly excluded, so procurement teams must check machine classifications carefully.

    Engineers Against Poverty chair: governance, carbon and cost lessons for project teams
    Policy
    11 days ago

    Engineers Against Poverty chair: governance, carbon and cost lessons for project teams

    Engineers Against Poverty chair Richard Threlfall calls for the engineering, infrastructure and construction profession to lead on cutting whole‑life emissions and controlling capital cost overruns in major civils programmes. He argues that effective infrastructure governance must move beyond compliance to active stewardship of carbon, cost and social outcomes, with engineers shaping procurement models and performance metrics rather than leaving them to financiers and policymakers. For practitioners, this signals greater responsibility for transparent cost baselines, carbon accounting and value-for-money evidence on large public works.

    Related Industries & Products

    Construction

    Quality control software for construction companies with material testing, batch tracking, and compliance management.

    Mining

    Geotechnical software solutions for mining operations including CMRR analysis, hydrogeological testing, and data management.

    QCDB-io

    Comprehensive quality control database for manufacturing, tunnelling, and civil construction with UCS testing, PSD analysis, and grout mix design management.